Friday, March 31, 2023

Synod on Eucharist in 2005: 4 of 12 Bishop Working Groups Called For Study on Viri Probati Married Priests; Papable Cardinal Scola of Venice Reported Request for Viri Probati to Pope w/Reply From Now Papable Cardinal Tagle of Manila Who Said, "We should face squarely the issue of the shortage of priests."





https://marriedpriesthood.blogspot.com/2019/12/cardinal-tagle-we-should-face-squarely.html?m=1

---

Excerpt:

Cardinal Angelo Scola of Venice, Italy, the relator (meaning roughly “moderator”) for the synod, started the celibacy discussion in his 52-page Relatio ante disceptationem, a synthesis of comments from around the world sent in prior to the synod.

Without identifying which bishops supported the measure, Scola reported that some synod participants had “put forward the request to ordain married faithful of proven faith and virtue, the so-called viri probati.’ ”

Scola himself expressed reservations about a change in the celibacy requirement, but drew a quick response from Bishop Luis Antonio G. Tagle of Imus, Philippines. “In the absence of the priest, there is no Eucharist. We should face squarely the issue of the shortage of priests,” he said.

Source: http://natcath.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2005d/101405/101405p.php (21 Dec. 2019)

---

Excerpt: 

This effort builds on our earlier work at the International Synod on the Eucharist in 2005 where the priest shortage dominated the agenda and four of twelve bishop small groups asked for further study of married priests.





Tuesday, March 28, 2023

Former Anglican priest convert to Catholic Faith and U.S. Army Maj. Ken Bolin, brigade chaplain for the 4th Brigade Combat Team (Airborne), 25th Infantry Division, gives his first blessing as an ordained married Catholic priest to Anchorage Archbishop Robert Schwietz at Our Lady of Guadalupe Parish March 7th

 



Former Anglican priest and U.S. Army Maj. Ken Bolin, brigade chaplain for the 4th Brigade Combat Team (Airborne), 25th Infantry Division, gives his first blessing as an ordained priest to Anchorage Archbishop Robert Schwietz at Our Lady of Guadalupe Parish March 7th. As an ordained priest, Bolin is authorized to celebrate both the standard Roman Missal Mass as well as the adapted Anglican Mass. Bolin is the newest of five married Catholic priests to currently serve in the chaplain corps on active duty in the U.S. Army. (Photo by U.S. Army Sgt. Eric-James Estrada) Unit: 4th Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division Public Affairs


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clerical_marriage (31 Jan. 2023)

Thursday, March 23, 2023

Why the Blog Silence? Why the Blog Silence from 2020-2023? (Quo Vadis, Domine?)

Why the silence?  

Why the silence between 2020-2023 on this blog?  Three years.  Silence.

Because we needed discernment.  

Authentic discernment.  


Not politicking and in-fighting among the People of God.  

Not parliamentary procedure and emotional ad hominems.  As the Latin Rite studies the Viri Probati, we needed time after the local Amazon Synod.

Time.

To discern.

To pray.

To understand.

To listen to His sweet voice.

Your voice, Lord.

Not the devil's voice.


Is this what He wants for His Church?

Viri Probati, Lord?

Restore tested older men?

Come, Holy Spirit!


It's not to say that Pastoral Provision priests or Ordinariate Priests were not tested, Viri Probati.  They were.  Axios!  They were found worthy.  Tested men on a different pathway to the holy priesthood of Jesus Christ.

Tested.

By Benedict XVI.

By John Paul II.

By Paul VI.

By John XXIII and by the Second Vatican Council.

By Pius XII.


It ain't just a Francis thing, folks!


In the 20th Century, the world's bishops in union with the Successor of Peter in solemn Council voted to ***honor*** married clergy! 

In Prebyterorum Ordinis.

Recognized.  Validated.  

Not tolerated.

By the Successor of Peter, John XXIII & Paul VI, and the 2,000+ Successors of the Apostles honored married men in Holy Orders.  

What Catholic can argue with the Pope and 2,000+ Bishops in union with him in solemn Council?

20th Century Popes and even Latin Rite Bishops recognized married men in Holy Orders!

And without expectation of perpetual continence!

To esteem married men in Holy Orders after over eight centuries of mandated celibacy in Latin Rite. 

Recognizing married clergy in the Latin Rite.  Like the diaconate for married men.  Over 2/3 of world's bishops restored the rank for Viri Probati.

A hermeneutic of continuity.  The modern world.  And the ancient world.

An unbroken succession.

To the Apostles.

To Melchizedek.

Melchizedek, a married king-priest.

Blessed day! 


Married priests in the Latin Rite perhaps opening up another pathway for full Communion between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches.

A moment of history.


Our time.

Where Latin Rite Catholics do not disparage married men in Holy Orders.  Finally. 

Not second class clergy.  Finally.

Yet honoring celibacy which has a place in the Latin Church. But not at the expense of denigrating married priests in the Latin Rite.


A moment of history.  That's why the Council happened.

In part perhaps. 

For two lungs of the Mystical Body of Christ to breath again.

That the world may believe.


And separated brethren in the West were given a pathway home to Rome.  To Apostolic Tradition.  To the priesthood that comes to us from the Twelve Apostles.

They were separated Protestant & Anglican brethren.  Now, they are our Fathers in Christ.  They are welcome.  They are most welcome.  And we love you, Fathers.  Welcome home.  Your home.  Our home. Where you belong.  Where your ordained ministry was tested.  And approved.  Tested men.  Proven men.  Like the East.


But now, Latin Rite Catholics.  Cradle Catholics.  Baptized as infants.  Confirmed in our youth.  We respectfully ask the Successor of Peter.

The Cardinals and Bishops who are Successors of the Apostles. 

For Viri Probati.

We respectfully ask.

We respectfully ask for married Catholic priests in the Latin Rite.

A pathway.

The Viri Probati pathway?

The simplex priests pathway?

Another pathway?


Perhaps start with married deacons?  There are 40,000 thousands of them.  Already Viri Probati. Start with some or many fruitful ones.  Already tested for diaconate.  Apprentice them for the priesthood.  

Married priests have to serve time as deacons first anyways. And celibate ones had to serve as deacons first.  Before priesthood ordination, all priests have to serve in diaconate ordination first anyways.

So select some.  Call some.  Or many.  As married priests.

Simple priests.  

Viri Probati priests.

From married diaconate...

...to the married priesthood.

No need to salary them.  

Like the deacons.  No salary.  But ministry.

Freely they received.

Freely they give.

They are successful with careers already.  

Many hold advanced degrees.  

Are retired.  Are executives.  Are leaders.  Are followers.  Are workers.  At the lower level of the hierarchy.

With successes and failures in life.

Life experience.  Some with great grandchildren.

They cover their own health insurance and retirement.  Not a financial drain on the local Diocese.

SCANDALS are less than 1% among the married deacons.  Divorce rate is less than 1% among the married deacons.

But most importantly, they are tested.  Older men.  

Like the early Apostolic age and the early Church.

Ressourcement..

Elders.

Fathers in Christ.


Thousands entered the permanent diaconate with no intention of pursuing the priesthood.  None.

But now.  If God wills.  

Through His Church, call some.  Or many.  Case by case.  Up to the local bishop.  Up to the regional bishops?  Up to the Holy See?  Up to the Supreme Pontiff.  

Motu Prioprio? Apostolic Constitution?

Perhaps entitle it "Viri Probati".

But none of the married deacons expected it.

40,000 deacons.  Already Viri Probati.

Choose viri probati married deacons to be viri probati married priests.

Add many or some fruitful deacons to the Order of Presbyter.

Permanent: Not intending to be priests.

From permanent deacon.

To transitional deacon.  

Some of them.

Their probation period.  As a married transitional deacon.

To prepare them as Viri Probati priests.

Married. 

Tested.

Proven.

Not 18 year old seminarians.  

But mature, older men.  Elders. 

In the person of Christ the Servant.

They bring Christ's servanthood.

Who came to serve and not be served.

Real servanthood.

Real sweat and blood.

With the poor.

The neglected.

Widows.

Orphans.

Like the first deacons they served.

And also today the deacons serve the widows and orphans who need the Eucharist.

Who need absolution of their sins.

Who need Holy anointing and Last Rites.

And family life they bring.

From the Dalmatic of Justice.

From the Order of Deacon.  Levite.

To the Order of Priest.  To the Chausible of the Sacred Presbyterate. 

To the person of Christ the Head.

In persona Christi.

To save souls.


If a married man is not a deacon, and he desires the priesthood, them let him serve in the diaconate.  For a time.

1 year?

3 years? 5 years? More?  Up to the bishop.

But let him be fruitful in the diaconate first.

As Cardinal Schonborn said: Permanent diaconate is like a "laboratory".

Tested.

Under a microscope.

Under a microscope even before admission to deacon formation.

Under a microscope during 5-6 years of deacon formation.

Under a microscope after ordination.

Look for your married priests in this laboratory of tests, pokes and prods, and microscopes.

No need to reinvent the wheel.  Start with the married deacons.

And discern.

Viri Probati.


And then they come with wives.  They come with tested family life.

Wives, the feminine element.

Surpassing the petrine element.

Holiness is superior to the priesthood.

Mothers.

Mothers of the parish.

Wives of deacons.

Wives of men in Holy Orders.

The image of the Church married to Jesus.


The conversations are taking place once again. 

In 2023.

Just like in 2020.

And in those 3 years, what did those against married priests in the Latin Rite say?

We learned.

We listened.

We studied.

The best case was put forward against married priests in the Latin Rite.

But the position against restoring married priests were not strong enough.

Is that it?

Is that all you have?

Even with all that, the Church by virtue of the power of the keys...

can dispense.

Nothing new. 

Nothing substantial against a restored married priesthood in the Latin Rite today.

Same as 2019.  Same as 2023.

<<<yawn>>>

The Ontologicalist Error, the position that celibacy-continence is essential to the priesthood, we found bordered on heresy. 

And how bitter they seemed.  Unhappy.

But others came out and supported married priests.

What was new is that married priests are possible once again in the Latin Rite.

We learned.  We discerned.

It's not Modernism.  It's not a Protestant thing.  It's not caving in to the secular world.

Married priests isn't just a liberal issue.  It's not just a conservative issue.

It's a Catholic issue.

Feed the flock!



So restore married priests in the Latin Rite?  

Restored...

...restored alongside celibate priests whom we love dearly.  

Who lived 812 years of mandated celibacy in the West.   From Lateran II in 1139 AD to Pius XII in 1952 AD.  

In the Roman Rite.

Celibacy/continence.  We learned.  Not of the essence of the priesthood.


As for Apostolic Tradition.  Needed in both West and East to be so.

What can change?

What can be dispensed by authority of the Church?

What cannot be dispensed by authority of the Church?


Capital T.  Sacred Tradition. - Cannot dispense.  Example: Priesthood for males.

Little t.  Like the traditions of the Church. - Can dispense.  Example: Celibacy/Continence.


Mandated celibacy in the West.  Lord, do you want us to continue in the current way?

You who give us shepherds to feed us?

You who feed the flock through Peter?

To feed us Your Body and Blood?

Feed us with your holy priests!

Lord, grant us married priests we beseech Thee.


But if You don't want it, Lord, destroy our efforts.

Accepto.


Is this what You want in the Latin Rite?


Souls.

The salvation of souls.

The salvation of souls is the supreme law of the Church.

Is there a way forward?


...

So yes.


Silence.

Silence for 3 years.


Discernment.


Prayer.  


And now action.


Your Holiness/Eminences/Excellencies, we ask you:

By virtue of your power to bind and loose.

Dispense married deacons.

Use Canon 1047.

Or any other relevant canon.

Or ecclesial decree.

Respecting celibacy as the Latin Rite modern norm.

Reaffirm dispensation from celibacy and thereby continence.

Discern after suitable formation.

Train.

Teach.

Prepare.

Taking into account the good of the Faithful.

The presence of a just and reasonable cause.

And given the circumstances of each case.

Call.

A portion of your married sons tested and proven in the Order of Deacon.

To lay upon their unworthy heads.

Your sacred and anointed hands.

The hands of Christ the High Priest.

And admit them.

With the sacred prayer of the Church.

Anoint them.

Bless them.

And send them.

To God's people.

To a broken world.

To married and family life torn asunder by the evil one.

To the priesthood torn asunder by the evil one.

To a restored tradition.

To the ancient norm of the married priesthood of Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ the Married Bridegroom.

Lover of His wife, the Church.

A great mystery!

And ordain these sons of Levite.

To the Order of Presbyter.

In Jesus' name.

We pray.

Amen.


Mary, Queen of the Clergy, pray for us!

Quo vadis, Domine?



 

Tuesday, March 21, 2023

Viri Probati: A Moderate Pathway for Married Priests (Latin Rite)

 


Copyright (c) 2023 marriedpriests.com 
(marriedclergyR&D)
All Rights Reserved

Permission granted to the general public to use this theoretical framework model with credit to marriedpriests.com


Friday, March 17, 2023

For St. Patrick's Day Today, Donate to marriedpriests.com to Honor St. Patrick, Son of a Deacon & Grandson of a Clergyman

St. Patrick was a son of a deacon and a grandson of a clergyman.  

To honor him, please consider donating to the cause of understanding married Catholic priests:

www.MarriedPriests.com

Support married priests research & development (R&D) with your prayers, talents and donations!




Sunday, July 12, 2020

Melchizedek the Married Priest-King


"You are a priest forever in the line of Melchizedek."


Melchizedek means "King of Righteousness"


If Melchizedek is Shem, as Jewish tradition & the Fathers of the Church & solid modern Catholic biblical scholars like Scott Hahn and John Bergsma assert, then the priesthood of Jesus Christ (as affirmed in the Letter to the Hebrews) literally and historically has roots in the MARRIED priesthood of Melchizedek.

Shem is the first-born son of Noah: "When Noah was five hundred years old, he became the father of Shem, Ham and Japheth" (Gen. 5:32).

"The descendants of Shem were Elam, Asshur, Arpachshad, Lud, and Aram" (1 Chronicles 1:17a).  <--- Shem had sons and thus logically would have been married to beget sons in this verse and theologically would be the foundation of a married Catholic priesthood in the Latin rite.  

[If one were to even insist the theological foundation of the married priesthood goes to Adam, from where Shem / Melchizedek comes (outside the scope of this writing here for now), that would be acceptable as well.]

"Shem, Arpachshad, Shelah, Eber, Peleg, Reu, Serug, Nahor, Terah, Abram, who was Abraham.  The sons of Abraham were Isaac and Ishmael" (1 Chronicles 1:24-28).


Adam ---> Noah ---> Shem / Melchizedek ---> Abraham   ---> St. Joseph ---> Jesus of Nazareth


EXCERPT:

...

First, who is Melchizedek? Why does this man styled as the “King of Salem” and whose name means “King of Righteousness”[3] only appear once in the book of Genesis for a brief encounter with Abraham, never to appear again? Well, the reader may be surprised to know that Melchizedek does appear more than once in the book of Genesis; in fact, he appears earlier in the book of Genesis, albeit under a different name. For Melchizedek actually makes his first appearance not as the righteous priest-king of Salem, but rather as the firstborn son of Noah the Patriarch, whose name is Shem.[4]

How do we know that Melchizedek is the same person as Shem? We know this most recently from the consensus of modern Catholic biblical scholars such as Scott Hahn,[5] John Bergsma,[6] Brant Pitre,[7] and Steven Smith.[8] Moreover, the ancient Jewish tradition almost unanimously identified Shem and Melchizedek as the same person;[9] for both the Targums — which were the ancient translations of the Jewish Scriptures into Aramaic, the language that the Jews spoke during the time of Jesus — and the later rabbinic tradition both regularly and consistently identify Shem and Melchizedek as being the same person.[10] Further, the Christian tradition — which is made up of the Fathers of the Church and of the Scholastic Theologians — was nearly just as unanimous as the Jewish tradition was on this point of the identity of Shem-Melchizedek.[11] Among the various Church Fathers that identified Shem with Melchizedek,[12] we have Saint Jerome who supported the thesis that Shem is Melchizedek,[13] and also Saint Ephrem the Syrian who also accepted this position, writing the following:

This Melchizedek is Shem, who became a king due to his greatness; he was the head of fourteen nations. In addition, “he was a priest.” He received [his priesthood] from Noah, his father, through the rites of succession. Shem lived not only to the time of Abraham, as Scripture says, but even to [the time of] Jacob and Esau.[14]

Further, the eminent Scholastic Theologian Saint Thomas Aquinas also accepted the tradition that Shem is Melchizedek in his commentary on Saint Paul’s Letter to the Hebrews. Here, the Angelic Doctor writes that:

For so the Scripture names [Melchizedek] in Genesis (Gen 14:18), where his history, which the Apostle supposes here, is recorded. According to a Gloss, the Hebrews say that this was Shem, the first-born of Noah, and when Abraham obtained the victory, he was 390 or 309 years old and met Abraham, his nephew.[15]

Lastly, the Glossa Ordinaria — which was the medieval compendium or collection of the various glosses or commentaries of the Church Fathers on Scripture — also affirms the identification of Shem with Melchizedek, writing that “the Hebrews say this Melchizedek was Shem son of Noah, who lived until Isaac.”[16] The Christian tradition’s possible unanimity or consensus on this topic is a particularly compelling point about the identity of Shem-Melchizedek, given the unanimity of the Fathers.   

...


* * *


Other sources (Catholic & non-Catholic):

John Bergsma & John Pitre, A Catholic Introduction to the Bible: The Old Testament (Ignatius Press, 2018): https://www.amazon.com/Catholic-Introduction-Bible-Old-Testament/dp/1586177222?asin=B07H46F524&revisionId=1e5c2668&format=1&depth=2

"Joseph, a Priest According to the Order of Melchizedek" b
y
 Joshua Francis Filipetto
 -
May 27, 2022 https://catholicinsight.com/joseph-a-priest-according-to-the-order-of-melchizedek/ (downloaded on 1/28/2023)

Arguments for and against: https://amazingbibletimeline.com/blog/melchizedek-and-shem/

Msgr. Charles Pope (does not favor married priests in Latin rite): https://cathstan.org/posts/who-was-melchizedek 

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Roman Cholij Changes Mind & Now Supports Married Eastern Priests: "This view represents a substantial development and change in my ecclesiological thinking since the time of writing my J.C.D. dissertation, subsequently published as 'Clerical Celibacy in East and West,' esp. pp. 179-192 [Footnote #53].


Credit: Byz _Guy

by Roman M.T. Cholij, published in Eastern Churches Journal, Summer 1997

In the article, Cholij breaks with his previous views and upholds the right of Eastern Churches to have a married clergy without papal interference. Previously, he had held to a view that Rome had the authority to approve or deny the Eastern tradition as it was considered to have been developed improperly while the Eastern Churches were in schism. Therefore, he had believed, Rome could either tolerate the Eastern tradition or legitimately forbid it. **Many who cite Cholij’s earlier writings on mandatory priestly celibacy are not aware of his change of views. **The reversal of his view can be seen here:

From pp. 49-50:

Thus the ecclesiological
suppositions of the times when the decrees prohibiting married
clergy were issued must be seen to have been defective. It should
also be stated that the constitutional rights of a Church sui iuris cannot
be removed by an administrative decree of a Congregation of the
Roman Curia. If a married clergy is such a right (which is what the
Eastern Churches do consider it to be, and which the Vatican Council
seems to implicitly affirm), as opposed to a privilege granted by Rome,
then there is serious objection to the lawfulness of any action which
restricts exercise of this right. 53

[53] This view represents a substantial development and change in my ecclesiological
thinking since the time of writing my J.C.D. dissertation, subsequently published
as Clerical Celibacy in East and West, esp. pp. 179-192. A similar view is
expressed in my article entitled “Celibacy, Married Clergy and the Oriental Code”
(see note 2). Since writing this early work I have also been fortunate to have had
the opportunity to do further studies: five years of research work in Eastern
Christian Studies at the University of Oxford under the tutorship and supervision
of Dr. Kallistos Ware of Pembroke College.

Sunday, June 28, 2020

Wednesday, June 24, 2020

Pope Paul VI Admits NT Objections to Mandated Celibacy: "Jesus Himself did not make it a prerequisite in His choice of the Twelve, nor did the Apostles for those who presided over the first Christian communities" (Sacerdotalis Caelibatus, no. 5).

Source: http://www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_24061967_sacerdotalis.html (24 June 2020)

Happy 53rd anniversary to this beautiful encyclical letter!

St. Paul VI, Sacerdotalis Celibatus, no. 5 (24 June 2020):

OBJECTIONS AGAINST PRIESTLY CELIBACY

5. It may be said that today ecclesiastical celibacy has been examined more penetratingly than ever before and in all its aspects. It has been examined from the doctrinal, historical, sociological, psychological and pastoral point of view. The intentions prompting this examination have frequently been basically correct although reports may sometimes have distorted them.

Let us look openly at the principal objections against the law that links ecclesiastical celibacy with the priesthood.

The first seems to come from the most authoritative source, the New Testament which preserves the teaching of Christ and the Apostles. It does not openly demand celibacy of sacred ministers but proposes it rather as a free act of obedience to a special vocation or to a special spiritual gift. (2) Jesus Himself did not make it a prerequisite in His choice of the Twelve, nor did the Apostles for those who presided over the first Christian communities. (3)

-------

(2) See Mt 19. 11-12.

(3) See 1 Tm 3. 2-5; Ti 1. 5-6.



St. Zachariah, married priest of the Old Testament who fathered St. John the Baptist after consecration as a priest, & husband of St. Elizabeth (a priest's wife), pray for us. St. John the Baptist, son of a #marriedpriest of the Old Covenant, pray for us.

St. Zachariah, married priest of the Old Testament who fathered St. John the Baptist after consecration as a priest, & husband of St. Elizabeth (a priest's wife), pray for us. St. John the Baptist, son of a #marriedpriest of the Old Covenant, pray for us.