Monday, May 25, 2020

Cardinal Oswald Gracias, J.C.D., of India (appointed cardinal by Benedict) on married priests: "It's open." "Following present canon law, there's a possibility" that Holy See can grant a "dispensation" to a married man to be ordained priest. Bishops need to petition Vatican.

Source: LifeSiteNews (25 Feb 2020) (accessed 25 May 2020)

Excerpt:

The cardinal from South Asia stresses in this new interview with the National Catholic Reporter that the Pope was under many “pressures” and that there are “people who do not want any change,” while at the same time others “want overnight changes.” 

“He's got to carry everybody with him,” Gracias explains, also in light of the fact that the Pope seeks “synodality.” In order to take everybody along, the cardinal adds, “we go slower than we would like to go because of that.” 

Commenting on Querida Amazonia, Gracias calls it “very clever” that the Pope is “endorsing the final document.” 

“Therefore the final document remains a valid reference point,” he explains. With regard to the question of the married priests, that means for the prelate that “it's open.” 

“He's not excluded any part of the final document – he's not excluded any part of it,” he states.

Gracias also comes back in this new interview to a proposal he himself had made during last year's Amazon Synod. “I had suggested in my intervention that, following present canon law, there's a possibility,” that the Holy See can grant “a dispensation” in the case of a married man who wishes to become a priest. Accordingly, the cardinal had then suggested that Amazon bishops, or groups of them, could petition the Vatican to grant them such a dispensation. Since the Pope, in his recent exhortation, did not address this matter directly, this possibility still is “open,” also in light of the Pope's “endorsing the [final] document. 

Sunday, May 24, 2020

Celibacy & continence do NOT appear in these early Church documents on church disciplines: Didache (c. AD 80 - AD 150), Apostolic Canons (c. AD 217), Didascalia (c. AD 250), Council of Nicea (AD 325); Conclusion: Mandated celibacy & mandated continence were NEW universal INNOVATIONS

(copy of Didache)

Celibacy & continence do NOT appear in these early Church documents on church disciplines:

Didache (c. AD 80) - did NOT mandate continence

Apostolic Canons (c. AD 217) - did NOT mandate continence

Didascalia (c. AD 250) - did NOT mandate continence

Council of Nicea (AD 325) a UNIVERSAL Council - did NOT mandate continence; decreed that priest cannot (re)marry after ordination

Conclusion: Mandated celibacy & mandated continence were local INNOVATIONS lacking universal and catholic discipline from the Twelve Apostles.

Pope Siricius in AD 385 first mandates continence.

The First Lateran Council in AD 1123 first mandates celibacy (no more married men ordained as priests in Latin rite).

Majorities in Latin American countries support married priests: Pew Research

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/12/20/many-catholics-in-latin-america-including-a-majority-in-brazil-support-allowing-priests-to-marry/ (24 May 2020)

Saturday, May 23, 2020

22% of world's Catholics live in Europe, but 42% of world's priests assigned in Europe: Europe still home to most of world's priests

Source: https://novenanews.com/europe-majority-priests-religious-minority-global-church/ (23 May 2020)

Excerpt:

Just 22% of the world’s Catholics live in Europe, and yet the continent is home to 42% of the world’s priests, according to Vatican statistics published this week.


Timeline for INNOVATION of MANDATED priestly continence & MANDATED priestly celibacy (no papal evidence of MANDATED continence for 352 years from Peter in AD 33 to Pope Siricius in AD 385; Pope Siricius said having kids after ordination is "giving heed to impure desires") (Also, MANDATED celibacy is only 829 years old; from AD 1123 to AD 1952 when Pope Pius XII allowed married priests BEFORE Vatican II)


AD 305 - Elvira Synod (19 SPANISH bishops)- 1st time #mandatedcontinence EVER appears in LOCAL council but NOT universal.  Thus, MANDATED continence not apostolic.  Popes & pre-Elvira councils did NOT require continence before AD 305.  The key word is "mandate" or "require" or "obligatory."

AD 325 - UNIVERSAL Council of Nicea REJECTS continence (proposed to bishops of ecumenical Council of Nicea BUT continence is REJECTED); only decreed that once ordained cannot get married after ordination

AD 385 -  1st time EVER a Bishop of Rome, Pope Siricius, requires discipline of continence for married priests and deacons that were already having kids after ordination; BUT does NOT make any claim to apostolic tradition; rejects argument that Levites in OT were having kids; writes that having kids after ordination is giving "heed to impure desires"

AD 390 - LOCAL (not universal) Synod of Carthage affirmed continence

AD 1123 - #First Lateran Council #mandatorycelibacy begins; 1st time EVER a UNIVERSAL Council decrees celibacy (no more ordaining married men as priests in Latin rite)

AD 1952 - #PopePiusXII allows 5 marriedmen as #LatinPriests, #PaulVI, JP2, B16 also allowed.  Dispensations/exceptions to mandated celibacy rule and therefore continence granted

---

Mandated celibacy decreed from 1123 to 1952 in Roman rite.  That is ONLY 829 years of MANDATED celibacy compared to 2,000 years of UNIVERSAL Catholic Church history.  

From AD 33 to 385, NO evidence exists of MANDATED continence.  That is 352 years of no Popes or UNIVERSAL Councils requiring MANDATED continence.  

THEREFORE, we can conclude: (1) MANDATED celibacy is an INNOVATION & (2) MANDATED continence is an INNOVATION.


Friday, May 22, 2020

Archbishop Ludwig Schick of Bamberg: We must go beyond a “black or white vision” of priestly celibacy since in "some exceptional circumstances ordination to priesthood is possible for married men"




Source: https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/querida-amazonia-well-beyond-ordination-married-men-57554 (22 May 2020)

Excerpt:

Amazon Exceptions Soon?

And if this maturation seems too slow, it will always be possible to anticipate decisions from Rome, in the name of the merciful responses that must be brought to pastoral needs in the Amazon. This is what Pirmin Spiegel, the director general of the German charity Misereor, very active in the Amazon region, is already planning. Speaking on March 3, outside the Bishops’ Conference in Mainz, Germany, he said that several bishops from the Amazon region will soon send requests to Rome to file for dispensations for the ordination of married deacons to the priesthood. According to him, by not speaking on the subject in his apostolic exhortation, the pope has not closed the door to exceptions.

This is confirmed by Archbishop Ludwig Schick of Bamberg, saying that we must go beyond a “black or white vision” (sic) of the question of priestly celibacy. According to him, it has long been clear in the Church, even the Latin rite, that in some exceptional circumstances ordination to the priesthood is possible for married men. Until now, this applied to the priests of the Eastern Churches in union with Rome or to converted Anglican and Protestant clergy, but other authorizations of the same type are possible.

As pointed out by FSSPX.News on March 11, under the eloquent title “A Magisterium with Flexible Geometry”: the Pope “is waiting for relevant bishops’ conferences to act—the principle of decentralization of authority, under the name of synodality, must come into play here. It is up to the bishops to do the work. The Pope said he would not abolish priestly celibacy, but he did not say he would not let the Amazon conferences ordain the viri probati. Quite the opposite.”


Sunday, May 17, 2020

Laity Liked How "I Feel Same Pressures" & "Some Marital Challenges" as Them: Married Priest Fr. Paul Sullins, Ph.D.

Source: https://www.patheos.com/blogs/deaconsbench/2012/11/understanding-married-priesthood/ (17 May 2020)

“The laity has been very supportive. They seem to like the fact that I feel the same pressures they do, and some of the same marital challenges. It helps us to relate to one another better,” [Married Priest] Father Sullins told Our Sunday Visitor.

Saturday, May 16, 2020

"Solution" in Canons 1042 & 1047: "Step By Step" Toward More Married Priests

Source: http://magister.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2020/05/15/step-by-step-toward-married-priests-an-update/ (16 May 2020)

Excerpt:

 The “third step” comes once the “plan” has been developed and consists in “presenting the request to the Holy See.”

And will the Holy See accept it? “Of course the Holy See could do so,” De Almeida replies. “In the Amazonian context and considering the synodal process set in motion after the announcement of the special synod for the Amazon, I have no doubt.”

But how will the ordination of married men be authorized? De Almeida says that “for now the solution is in the code of canon law,” which in canons 1042 and 1047 admits that in special cases the Holy See can exempt candidates for the priesthood from the “impediment” of marriage, “taking into account ‘the good of the faithful,’ the presence of a ‘just and reasonable cause’ (access of the faithful to the celebration of the Eucharist) and ‘the circumstances of the case’ (in the Amazon, the almost complete absence of celibate clergy).”



Thursday, May 14, 2020

ontologizing of mandated continence & mandated celibacy in priesthood is NOT apostolic Tradition

No where, absolutely NO WHERE, do we find "mandated" continence or "mandated" celibacy as essential to the priesthood in Apostolic Tradition.

Celibacy, yes, is in Apostolic Tradition.  But "mandated" celibacy, no, is not in Apostolic Tradition.

Celibacy v. mandated celibacy.  There is a difference.

We cannot be more traditional than Tradition.



My Comment Contribution for 'Catholic World Report' Article on Married Priests, Celibacy & Amazon Synod by Eastern Catholic Priest

Source: https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2019/08/21/married-priesthood-celibacy-and-the-amazon-synod-an-eastern-catholic-priests-perspective/ (14 May 2020)


My Comment Contribution:

Here, Albrecht hit the heart of the matter and correctly stated, "There is no evidence for the alleged apostolic obligation of perpetual continence until the third century..."  That's right & even Cardinal Stickler (and Cardinal Sarah's book with B16's CONTRIBUTION to Sarah's book) cannot find any evidence before AD 305.  There is simply NO, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA evidence prior to AD 305 for 'mandated' continence.  Clement of Alexandria in AD 200 said the Church accepts married priests and deacons who are saved in begetting children.  The VERY FIRST evidence for mandated continence was the LOCAL Elvira Synod of AD 305 which had only 19 bishops from Spain.  A forteriori, Elvira Synod (which carries the same juridical weight as the Amazon Synod btw) was a LOCAL and NOT UNIVERSAL act of a very small section of the Catholic Church.  Thus, it is erroneous to hold that "married priests were expected to be continent" or that "obligatory continence comes from the apostles" bc of the Elvira Synod -- THERE IS NO EVIDENCE BEFORE AD 305. One can say that continence "came from an epoch close to the Apostles" (which B16 did say while Pope), but scholarship shows that 'mandatory continence' does not come from the Apostles.  We cannot be more traditional than Tradition.  As B16 as CONTRIBUTOR (not co-author) CONTRIBUTED to +Sarah's book, "love is essence of priesthood of Jesus Christ."  V2 said in PO16 that celibacy is "not of the essence of the priesthood" and Trent and theologians from Trent held that celibacy is NOT divine law.  Thus, agape is the heart of the priesthood of the New Law, and all the debates about continence and celibacy are like the circumcision issue.  The Church has the authority to declare and regulate celibacy and continence, to grant dispensations to the celibacy Latin norm and ordain married deacons to the priesthood as the Church see fits. The Church taketh away but the Church also giveth.

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

My Tweet on Fatima, Married Priests & Final Battle Between Our Lord & Satan

Conversation

Celibacy NOT Essential to Priesthood & St. Paphnutius, Defender of Married Clergy, at Council of Nicea (AD 325): Henry Karlson


As a primary source, this is one of the most illustrative explanations on the case for a restored noncontinent married priesthood in the Latin rite.

It is based on 2 Church historians, Socrates Scholasticus & Sozomen from the 4th Century, who describe a holy celibate monk named St. Paphnatius defending married clergy at most likely the Council of Nicea.  Synesius of Cyrene is also cited.

Source: Clerical Celibacy: Not Essential to Orders | Henry Karlson
(13 May 2020)

Excerpt:
What is important in this historical incident is the recognition that there were bishops, priests, and deacons, all who were married, and among them, there were those still having relations with their wives, having more children while in a position of ecclesial authority. And, although there were various jurisdictions in which disciplines emerged where ecclesiastical authorities were expected to put away their wives and no longer have relations with them, these disciplines were not universal.

Saturday, May 9, 2020

“Why not?” on Married Priests: Luxembourg Cardinal Jean-Claude Hollerich (2019) Amazon Synod Father

Source: https://novenanews.com/luxembourg-cardinal-hollerich-married-priests/ (9 May 2020)

Except: 
 viri probati 

'old normal' = married priesthood / 'new normal' = mandatory celibate priesthood

"Mandated Celibacy" as "Gift" is a Novel 20th Century Theological Innovation, Lacking Strong Biblical & Apostolic Evidence?

My comment on https://virtueonline.org/only-half-catholic-priests-are-celibate-mike-mcmanus (9 May 2020) 

When Cardinal Sanchez headed the Vatican Congregation for the Clergy, he was presented with the same data, and he seemed to agree with the 50% estimate. Also, theologically, where do we find the word "gift" attributed to mandatory celibacy? Our Lord didn't use those words when speaking of the eunuchs for the sake of the Kingdom, and I dont think the Church Fathers spoke that way. Isn't that word more of a 20th Century development? Thank you.
MarriedPriesthood.blogspot.com
Twitter: @marriedpriests
FB: marriedpriests

_______

Added comments: Certainly, it didn't appear before 1129 and 1139 during Lateran I and Lateran II, respectively.  Those 2 dates are when the Latin rite decreed (universal) mandated celibacy.  Perhaps the Church Fathers didn't see it as ritual impurity to offer the sacrifice, and I am sure that the word "gift" has to have some basis in Apostolic Tradition.  Otherwise, it is a novelty.

Justin the Martyr and Tertullian wrote about virginity and continence but it wasn't "mandated celibacy." 

Mandated celibacy and mandated continence are a novelty without strong evidence before the LOCAL Elvira Synod of A.D. 305.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Cardinal Michael Czerny: Married Priests "Still on Table"

Source: https://youtu.be/Mj7bn7Nl_tU (12 March 2020)

"Pope Francis did not, as some journalists reported, 'close the door' on the possibility of ordaining married men. He left the door precisely as it was: ajar": Philip Lawler, Catholic Culture

Source: https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/to-come/ (12 March 2020)

Excerpt:

Since the papal document is silent on the issue, the Final Document approved by the bishops appears as the last word on the subject. Pope Francis made a point to “officially present” that document in his apostolic exhortation, adding: “I would encourage everyone to read it in full.”

At a Vatican press conference introducing Querida Amazonia, Cardinal Michael Czerny underlined the importance of this papal gesture, saying that “this official presentation and encouragement confer on the Final Document a certain moral authority.” He conceded that the Final Document is not a magisterial document, yet he argued: “To ignore it would be a lack of obedience to the Holy Father’s legitimate authority.”

So then was the Pope, by his silence, giving his tacit approval to the Synod’s most controversial recommendation? Andrea Tornielli, who is the editorial director of the Vatican’s dicastery for Communications—and thus can presumably be trusted for an accurate reflection of the Pope’s intentions—wrote:

This topic has been discussed for a long time and may continue to be discussed in the future because, “perfect and perpetual continence” is “not demanded by the very nature of the priesthood”, as the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council stated.

In short, Pope Francis did not, as some journalists reported, “close the door” on the possibility of ordaining married men. He left the door precisely as it was: ajar.

Be Cautious With Reports From Catholic News Agencies: Reply to Traditionalist Site (Return to Tradition)

My comment written in reply to an analysis of Traditionalist site "Return to Tradition" of 2/4/2020 to exercise caution about reporting (source: https://youtu.be/dyRNr36laVY):

Dr. Stine, your analysis is the same as my own.  And I'm glad a traditional source like yours said it.  LSN seemed premature reporting the abolishing celibacy rumor, even if it was based on journalists who tend to be more reliable than not, and they should have acted as Voris did who verified his facts before going public about McC.  Having "several bishops" as the source or simply re-quoting the Synod document in the LSN article are not the same as actual post-synodal draft quotes which they did not publish.  There was no solid evidence other than rumor.  Also, even if the post-synodal document doesn't address married priests this month, as this second source is saying, I did want to comment here that it doesn't preclude Francis from addressing it another time (perhaps after Sarah's book comes out).  But like you said, let's wait and see.  Finally, for the record, I am not advocating abolishing celibacy, but rather we should maintain celibacy as the 'norm' in the Latin rite but grant canonical dispensations on a case by case basis.  This is what 20th Century Popes have done starting with Pope Pius XII who dispensed a married man to the Latin rite priesthood in 1952 before Vatican II. There were 5 more married priests that following that first dispensation in Germany. Francis wouldn't be doing anything different. There were no expectations for continence from them then, just as there are no expectations for mandated continence for the Ordinariate married priests now.  The Church has the authority to decree on such matters.  The Church taketh away but the Church also giveth.

Monday, May 4, 2020

"I guess we can all go back to 'normal'": Analogy from WALL-E movie to restore a married Latin rite priesthood


This clips from "WALL-E" (@3:15) best expresses the state of the Catholic media on Feb 12.

After realizing that the ship is not returning to Earth, the umpteenth captain of a ship that has been wandering around in space for over 700 years says, "So I guess we're going back to normal."  By 'normal,' the captain refers to life in space instead of returning to Earth.

What the captain doesn't realize is that humanity floating in space for 700 years isn't normal.  Living on Earth is normal for humanity.

Everyone on the ship has been there for 700 years that they've forgotten what normal is.

On Feb. 12, 2020, many thought we were going back to 'normal' just like the captain of the space ship.  By 'normal' is meant returning to mandated celibacy in the Latin rite.

Mandated celibacy was strictly in force from 1123-1952.  That is 829 years of what 99.9% of Roman Catholics think is normal.  They think the Church has always had celibate priests for 2,000 years.  Wrong.  

They think it is an innovation but really it is a restoration.  Most of the Latin Church's history had married priests.

But 1952?  Why didn't I say 2020?  Yes, in 1952, Pope Pius XII admitted married men to the Latin rite priesthood BEFORE Vatican II.  This was a break from the norm since 1123.  

Thus ended absolute mandatory celibacy in the Latin rite.  Paul VI followed with more dispensations, along with JP2 with the Pastoral Provision, and Benedict XVI with the Ordinariate.  All these Popes allowed married priests.

Francis didn't start -- or, rather end -- anything.  Pius XII did, and he did it with a dispensation from the current norm.

There is absolutely nothing prohibiting a married priesthood theologically, juridically, practically, or in any other sense and meaning, save the will of Christ.  The de facto existence of married priests in the 2,000 year history of the Church shows that.

The current norm is actually the new normal.  Celibate priests is the new normal.  The old normal was actually married priests.

That means that mandated celibacy is only 829 years young.

That also means that married priests have existed in the Latin rite for 1,121 years to date.  And this doesn't even include the East which has had married priests since the beginning of the Church.

Married priesthood is part of venerable apostolic tradition.  It is the old normal.

So yes let's go back to normal, as the captain said, and let's go back to the way it was.  Let's restore the old normal by allowing more 'dispensations' for married men to be ordained the the priesthood of Jesus Christ.

That is really what is normal.